terça-feira, 22 de setembro de 2015

WELCOME TO THE INTERNET

http://www.thatsfake.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/abe-lincoln.jpg

No such "ministerial decree" that closes social sciences and humanities programs in Japan

As a former junior official in the Japanese higher education bureau, I have been deeply disappointed to learn a misled and distorted image circulating all over the world. I am talking about all the articles about the future of Japanese social sciences and humanities: "Japan rethinks higher education in skills push" (The Wall Street Journal), "Social sciences and humanities faculties to close in Japan after ministerial decree" (Times Higher Education), etc. I am writing this note because I have been asked about the issue by several people around me but, lamentably, I couldn’t find any English sources that rectify this misunderstanding. 
To be clear, there is no such fact that the Japanese education ministry plays down social sciences and humanities for the sake of putting a higher priority on vocational training. The ministry has already been clear about the importance of these areas. Unlike the conventional belief, the ratio of our grants in-aid for scientific research spent on social sciences and humanities has been growing in the last decade. There have been several projects in place that promote researches in these areas as well. 
Why such misreporting, then? The havoc was caused by a misled interpretation of a 10-page-long guideline sent administratively to 86 national universities in June this year. Private universities (which count around 600) are, of course, not the recipients of the guideline. 
The guideline bundles many pieces of general advice to national universities, encouraging their organizational reforms. It clarifies that, taking into account the constitutionally-stipulated principle of academic autonomy, each university has to take an initiative in determining the individual content of reform. The guideline, therefore, does not apply in a uniform manner across all 86 national universities. 
Merely one sentence of the long guideline may be accused of the misunderstanding: “With regard to the programs of teacher training, and humanities and social sciences in particular, it is encouraged to stipulate a reform plan, taking into consideration the reduction of 18-year-old population, human resource demands, expected level of education and research, the roles of national universities and etc., and dismantle and restructure organisations based on social needs”. Some may wonder why the ministry used the word “dismantle”. Well, this word is particularly reserved for irregular programs in teachers college, collectively called “shinkatei” whose purpose is not necessarily teacher training. Many of the teachers colleges in national universities created “shinkatei” and transferred a part of their student capacity to it largely because of the relative abundance of teachers in the late 1980s. Now that some regions may suffer from teacher shortage, the ministry intends to place these teachers colleges back on track so that they concentrate on teacher training.
* This note is based on my personal view and does not represent the official view of Japan’s education ministry.
* Mr. Kan Suzuki, Special Advisor to Japan’s education minister, writes on this issue in depth in Japanese. I owe the making of this note a great deal to his article. Japanese readers are encouraged to refer to Mr. Suzuki’s article: http://diamond.jp/articles/-/76705
* Below are some of the articles reporting this issue.
 http://www.diarioonline.com.br/app/painel/modulo-noticia/img/imagensdb/original/destaque-340517-fake.jpg

Nenhum comentário: